PB Nominations made official
The Joint Nominating Committee for
the Election of the Presiding Bishop formally nominated four bishops as
candidates to become the 27th presiding bishop of The Episcopal
Church during a joint session of the houses of Deputies and Bishops at General
Convention yesterday, June 26. The nominations were accepted without comment
from the floor.
On June 27, the House of Bishops
will gather at St. Mark’s Cathedral here to elect the next presiding bishop.
The candidates are Diocese of Southern Ohio Bishop Thomas Breidenthal, Diocese
of North Carolina Bishop Michael Curry, Diocese of Connecticut Bishop Ian
Douglas and Diocese of Southwest Florida Bishop Dabney Smith.
After the election Presiding Bishop
Katharine Jefferts Schori will send a delegation to House of Deputies President
the Rev. Gay Clark Jennings to inform her.
Jennings will refer the bishop’s
name to the House of Deputies legislative committee on the Confirmation of the
Presiding Bishop without announcing the name to the full house. That committee
will recommend to the House of Deputies whether or not to confirm the election,
and the deputies immediately will vote on the recommendation. Jennings then
will appoint a delegation of deputies to notify the House of Bishops of the
action taken, and the presiding bishop-elect will come to the House of
Deputies.
Prayer Book revision
planning proposed
The Prayer Book, Liturgy and Music Committee has filed a resolution asking General Convention to “Direct the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music to prepare a plan for the comprehensive revision of the current Book of Common Prayer” and present it to the next convention. The committee asks for a $30,000 allocation to fund this work.
The resolution directs that the
plan to “utilize the riches of our church’s liturgical, cultural, racial,
generational, linguistic, gender and ethnic diversity in order to share common
worship.” The funding would allow consultation on the plan for revision with
members of various cultural and ethnic groups across the church, said the Rev.
Devon Anderson, deputies committee chair. “It’s about bringing those
communities in very early on.”
Talking about the structure
of the church
Deputies discuss structure |
Deputies and bishops met in a special joint session yesterday for an hour-long conversation about The Episcopal Church’s structure and governance and how it can best support and enable mission at all levels.
“Structure, governance, polity,
canons, rules of order – most people’s eyes glaze over when they hear these
words,” Diocese of Minnesota Deputy Sally Johnson said in her opening remarks,
made with Diocese of Pennsylvania Bishop Clifton Daniel. They are deputy and
bishop chairs of the Legislative Committee on Governance and Structure, which
is in the process of hearing testimony on numerous restructuring proposals.
“What do rules and structure have
to do with what God is doing in the world, and our place in it as individual
followers of Jesus, or as The Episcopal Church, this particular incarnation of
the body of Christ?” Johnson asked.
She and Daniel gave a brief
historical overview of how The Episcopal Church’s polity and governance came
into being, noting that the way the church organizes itself for mission has
been evolving since the adoption in 1789 of its original constitution and
canons.
“The great thing about The
Episcopal Church is that we decide all these things for ourselves. And if we
don’t like our previous choices, or they don’t serve us anymore, we can change
them,” Johnson said. “It has never been static, it has continuously changed and
evolved and so too, today, the goal of our considerations is how we might best
change our structures and governance to give greater viability to our
congregations and ministries.”
“Governance is about our identity
and our mission,” Daniel said. “Who are we? What do we care about? What are we
going to spend our time, talent and treasures on? Who decides and how will we
decide?”
They asked diocesan deputations to
split up into small groups with deputations seated nearby and discuss the structures,
programs and activities of the church at all levels that support or enable
their congregations and dioceses to more fully participate in God’s mission.
The groups also discussed what changes in those same structures, programs and
activities would better serve congregations and dioceses in mission.
They were invited to tweet their
responses using the hashtag #gcgas
No comments:
Post a Comment